Barrett, J. (2001). Observing to learn. In G. Olson,
J. Barrett, N. Rasmussen, A. Barresi, & J. Jensen (Eds.), Looking in on music teaching.
SUMMARIZE:
Ø
Introduction
·
Principle in this
chapter useful in four areas:
-
Observing via
video
-
Observing in area
schools
-
Peer observation
of own class
-
Own class via
video
·
Consider the
following first:
-
Clear why
statement
-
Understanding
personal standpoint
-
Specifics to look
for in classroom
-
Evaluation of
one’s own observational techniques
Ø An Observation Story
· Rick didn’t realize what the teacher was trying to do with her class
· He didn’t think about the kids personally (including their backgrounds)
· He merely criticized what he saw going on
· Didn’t take the time to think about it and talk it through with the teacher
Ø Clarifying Purposes: Why Are We Looking In?
· A lot of learning in incidental – done while “doing’ other things
· Much of what we think we know about teaching comes from merely “hanging around” schools
· Five Purposes for Observation:
· To Develop Perceptual Acuity
- More is gained from anything when guided through discovery/perception
- Perceptive skills must be developed – see more, and more clearly
- Comparisons with other teachers helps hone perception
· To Build a Broader Knowledge Base for Music Teaching
- Observations can provide new types of teaching – experiences one may not otherwise have
- Can even be used for those who have little or no foundation in music teaching – like administrators and/or school boards
· To Help Direct Another Teacher’s Growth
- Teachers can create curriculum and programs together – cooperation is creative
- If involving administrators, can promote support for music programs
- As one can critique one’s peers, one’s peers can return the favor
· To Examine Cases of Practice in Instructional Settings
- Lee Shulman suggests case methods used to illustrate:
· Principles or concepts of a theoretical nature
· Precedents for practice
· Morals or ethics
· Strategies, dispositions, and habits of mind
· Visions or images of the possible
- Promote discussion, provide multiple layers of meanings
· To Develop Professional Judgment
- Observers need to be critical – reasoned, reflective, based on sound philosophy
- Components of professional judgment, according to John Elliott:
· Observational nuance, ability to pinpoint events and feelings associated with a particular class setting
· Salience, capacity to sort out important/unimportant
· Component interaction or coherence, ability to determine what fits/what doesn’t
· Action path, ability to formulate solutions based on conclusions drawn from observation and experience
- Which observations help characterize flow of classroom best?
- How do teacher/students interact?
Ø Clarifying Perspectives: Who Is Looking In?
· Expectations and Interpretations
- Perceptions of events can differ between people
- Observations can be affected by prior experiences, values, beliefs, habits, and abilities
- Think about how your descriptions and interpretations relate to your own views and opinions
- These would all influence observation:
· Preservice teacher enrolled in the practicum
· Student teacher or intern teacher
· First- or second-year teacher
· “Career” teacher
· Cooperating teacher
· University supervisor
· University methods professor
· Graduate student
· Music supervisor or administrator
· Retired music educator
- Metaphors are often used by teachers to talk about their work
· Lesson as a moving object: behind/ahead/moving forward/etc
· Information as a conduit: from teacher to student; mind a container; stuff covered
- Media often uses a metaphor that compares schools to factories with output, etc.
- Learning multiple techniques at once can change way they’re all viewed
- Professional readings can have effect (ex. teacher who reads of boy/girl unfair treatment)
Ø Clarifying Focus and Choosing Frameworks for Observation: What Are We Looking For?
· Purpose is different every time we look in on a classroom
· Observational forms can be useful to provide focus to observation; can also be limiting, however
· Level of detail/generality is important to pay attention to, too
· Embedded Square – Educational Experience, inside Teacher, Subject Matter, Learner, and Educational Context
· Venn diagrams – Teacher/Music/Student, and, of course, areas of overlap
· Observation as Problem-Finding
- “Technical rationality” – professional knowledge represented by clear-cut problems/solutions
- Other view – complex, ever-changing, messy problems with teaching and learning
- A disposition that tolerates this is necessary for a teacher who teaches in those areas
- Observations can show these cases, good and bad
· Question Sets as Focus
- Inquiry/growth is fueled by asking important/far-reaching/relevant questions
- Questions suggested by Pultorak to guide observation and reflective analysis:
· What were the essential strengths of the lesson?
· What, if anything, would you change about the lesson?
· Do you think the lesson was successful? Why?
· Which conditions were important to the outcome?
· What unanticipated learning outcome, if any, resulted from the lesson?
· What unanticipated teaching outcomes, if any, resulted from the lesson?
· Can you think of another way you might have taught this lesson?
· Can you think of other pedagogical approaches to teaching this lesson that might affect the learning process differently?
· Do you think the content covered was important to the students? Why?
· Did any moral or ethical concerns occur as a result of this lesson?
- Other questions to focus more on music and relationships between teacher/learner:
· What does this teacher mean by musicianship? How does the teacher demonstrate musicianship?
· How do these students demonstrate musicianship?
· What musical goals does this teacher seem to hold? From the beginning of the excerpt to the end, what progress is made toward the attainment of those goals?
· What constitutes a musical response according to this teacher? What forms does musicality take – evidence of verbal knowledge, musicianship through performance, creative responses or musicianship as shown through critique and evaluation of performance?
· What variances in musical responses did you observe among the students? Can you find evidence that the students are supporting each other in musical ways?
· Informed Use of Observation Forms
- Can be limiting
- Must still be open to all things, just stay focused for purposes of form
Ø Evaluating Perceptions and Conclusions: How Well Do We Observe?
· Intro
- Teaching is private and public, open
- Observers, therefore, really can be on the outside of what’s going on
- Rush to judgment – stifled reflective thinking through premature opinions; to be avoided
· Are Our Perceptions Careful?
- Absolute objectivity is impossible, but careful perceptions can attempt to take whole picture
- Don’t generalize too much, but match level of observing with level or purposes
· Does Observation Lead to Insight?
- Familiarity with teaching situation breeds compliments, easy insight, little growth
- More will actually be learned from a completely opposite, outrageous teaching style
· Do Perceptions and Conclusions Lead Back to Action?
- The goals of the observation are not where it all ends; the lessons learned then need to be applied to/by the teacher is his/her classroom
- Sometimes techniques, examples, strategies, etc. can be applied directly
- Other times, only concepts or spirits can be applied
· Are Our Summaries of Observations Honorable?
- Obligated to report with integrity
- Remain aware of complexity and context for each teaching scenario
Ø Introduction
· Good music ed classes can make you feel confident; yet, questions still exist
· Student teaching can help these, but some may still exist
· “Real” teaching will answer most the remaining questions, but not all, and new ones pop up
· Becoming a teacher is life-long process
Ø The Role of Preparatory Course Work In the Process of Becoming a Teacher
· Process to learn is in all music course work, not just music ed classes
· No set standard for all music classes – depend upon area, culture, etc.
· But one goal is common: to prepare preservice teachers to enter profession successfully
· Methods courses, labs, and student teaching provides opportunities for growth of all kinds
· All teachers-in-training must have opportunities for the following, according to Vincent Rogers:
- Create, invent, and improvise
- Practice the art of perception, perceiving with all senses
- Communicate and represent ideas in a variety of ways
- Collaborate with others
- Engage in genuine inquiry, based on perception of events and reflection
- Engage in planning and curriculum design based on the study of ideas and contexts, so that connections and relationships may be examined
- Participate in modeling, mentoring, and apprenticeship relationships, with other teachers
- Learn, grow, and develop “in-process” throughout the teaching career
· Methods, practice, ad student teaching are all directly related
- Methods informs your practice, practice informs understanding and theories
- Real-life experiences allow of assessment of theories
· Student teaching offers chances to create, invent, improvise, perceive, reflect, communicate, collaborate, plan, problem-set and problem-solve, and fully participate in a mentoring relationship
Ø Preservice Practice: Observation, Practicum, and Student Teaching
· Constructing Understanding Through Practice
- Journals of practice, student teaching experiences can help answer questions
- To write well, one must perceive, invent, reflect, and inquire well
- Collaboration is writing, critiqued or reviewed
- Through this all, one can realize the complexity of the educational process
- Asking “Do my students really understand?” and “Why/why not?” are fundamental to inquiry
- Informal research and inquiry allows problems to be better understood and reframed, so that they can eventually actually be solved
- One’s own experience and personal practice combines with theories
· What you do = What you know (in importance to understanding teaching)
· The Role of Supervision
- Must have positive relationship between student, university teacher, and supervising teacher
- Understanding that all are in-process is crucial too
- Key questions for analysis of supervision, according to John Smyth:
· Why am I doing this?
· What are my reasons?
· What re the effects of my actions on my students?
- You will even be supervised as a teacher, by arts supervisor, principals, etc.
- Biggest problem traditionally, Smyth says, is that it is done from a dependence-causing hierarchal perspective, even if done nicely
- Change can be brought about through global imposition, not intrinsic change
· For example, school/district adopts policies that directly affect teachers
- Teachers must be directly involved in their own development
- Self-reflection and growth is important, too
- Three-way conference following observation can be a formal time of reflection
- One’s ideas need to be clearly stated so that conversation is accurate and possible
- A plan for growth should result from the inquiry
- All these can be influenced by outside sources, but should come from one’s self
Ø Professional Growth in the Practice of Education
·
Early Inservice Years: Continuing the Path
- Mentorship with a more experienced teacher can be beneficial
- One will have questions/concerns
- As time goes on and more experience is gained, one will reorder some of these
- By three or four years in, the teacher is “on his/her own” and fairly comfortable
DISCUSS:
This reading selection seems to be
most useful in the next few years, although I suppose parts of it will apply
for my entire teaching career. As I
begin my next four years of field observations with a visit to
[ home ] [ philosophy ] [ mused courses ] [ pgp ] [ intasc standards ] [ links ]